According to the Sun newspaper all 'foreigners' have been banned from Big Ben over fears that this iconic worldwide tourist landmark could be targeted by an Al-Qaeda type attack. The reasoning behind this is that it is too costly to pre-screen foreign visitors who are looking to tour the location (which are all pre-arranged in any case), however British citizens will still be allowed (after the appropriate checks have been carried out of course).
I cannot help but think that the House of Commons has got this one a little wrong. Isn't the insider threat one of the most significant security risks to any establishment at the moment? Also what about the British Citizens whom are 'sleepers' and have never been on the authorities’ radar but with the right opportunity wouldn't think twice about causing harm to others.
Since when did British Citizens pose a lower risk then most foreign citizens - apart from of course a number of obvious countries!?
So what is next banning tourists from St Pauls, London Eye or the Natural History museum? You heard it here first.............
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments.
Team Chatback